Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Would the following phrase be considered positive or negative? 's muy loco , but no more ridiculous

answer:To determine whether the phrase is positive or negative, let's analyze it step-by-step. Step 1: Identify the key words in the phrase. Key words in this phrase are "muy loco" (very crazy) and "no more ridiculous." Step 2: Understand the meanings of each key word and their connotations. "Muy loco" has a negative connotation as it refers to something being very crazy, which often indicates an unfavorable or out of control situation. However, depending on the context, it can also have a positive or humorous connotation if referring to something fun and wild. "No more ridiculous" implies that something is not any more absurd than something else. This part of the phrase has a neutral connotation as it is making a comparison and does not explicitly label something as good or bad. Step 3: Evaluate the overall tone of the phrase. Considering both parts of the phrase, the overall tone appears to be neutral leaning towards slightly negative. The use of "muy loco" suggests a potentially negative view of a situation. However, the addition of "no more ridiculous" softens the negativity as it implies that the situation is not entirely absurd. In conclusion, this phrase can be seen as neutral to slightly negative, but the context in which it is used may impact the interpretation.

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Premise: "The hands that had grabbed me belonged to a little man." Based on this premise, is the hypothesis "The giant man touched me." true?

answer:The task is to analyze the given premise and verify if the hypothesis "The giant man touched me" is true. Step 1: Understand the premise. The premise specifies that "The hands that had grabbed me belonged to a little man." Step 2: Define the major components within the premise. These are "hands", "grabbed", and "little man." Step 3: Understand the hypothesis. The hypothesis states "The giant man touched me." Step 4: Define the major components within the hypothesis. These are "giant man" and "touched". Step 5: Compare the premise and the hypothesis. It can be seen that the premise talks about "a little man" whereas the hypothesis mentions "a giant man." Considering these phrases likely refer to the size or stature of the man, these two descriptions are opposites. Step 6: Determine if the change in the description is significant. In this case, the difference between "little" and "giant" is significant - they are complete opposites. So, based on these steps, the hypothesis "The giant man touched me" is false based on the given premise "The hands that had grabbed me belonged to a little man." The misalignment between the size of the man in the premise and hypothesis warrants this conclusion.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. The Ravens entered the game concerned that they would have trouble, having lost 3 matches in the year to teams with losing records on the road. This increased their determination. On their first possession, they came within field goal range on 4th and 1, and decided to attempt to convert, which failed. But on their next possession, Ray Rice scored a touchdown for a 7-0 lead. Billy Cundiff missed two moderate field goals in the first half, but toward the end, made one that increased the lead to 10-0. The Browns forced a fumble in the third quarter and capitalized on it with a field goal, cutting this lead to 10-3. But on the ensuing drive, Ray Rice, who rushed for over 200 yards in the entire game, had a 67-yard gain which led to a touchdown, increasing the lead to 17-3. They would later add to that cushion when Lardarius Webb returned a punt 68 yards for a touchdown. The Browns made one more touchdown, making what would be the final score of 24-10. But when the Ravens got their final possession, following the 2-minute warning, they were able to run out the clock as they won their 7th-straight game over the Browns and improved to 9-3. Answer this question based on the article: How many field goals were attempted in the first half?

answer:Based on the article, there were three field goals attempted in the first half. This inference can be made from the information given that during the Ravens' first possession, they were within field goal range but decided to attempt to convert on 4th and 1, which failed. This first attempt is assumed to be a field goal attempt since they were within range. Then, the text further describes that Billy Cundiff missed two moderate field goals in the first half. So, when these two missed attempts by Cundiff are added to the initial failed attempt by the team in their first possession, it can be concluded that there were a total of three field goal attempts in the first half.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Answer the following question: What would be the ★-rating of this review (★ being the lowest and ★★★★★ being the highest)? "I am very proud to install this app. Very useful stockfish 8. Thanks sir" Answer:

answer:Based on the positive tone and appreciation expressed in the brief review, the reviewer appears to be highly satisfied with the app and its functionality. They mention being "very proud" to install the app and find it "very useful," as well as expressing gratitude to the creator. Although the review does not explicitly contain a star rating, based on the positive remarks, one can assume that the writer would most likely give the app a high rating, perhaps ★★★★★ or very close to it.

Released under the Neuralink License.

has loaded