answer:Title: Glee Creator Ryan Murphy and Kings of Leon Clash Over Music Rights: A Missed Opportunity for Arts Education? Introduction "Preach what you practice," goes the saying. Nowhere does the concept of demonstrating one's love for an art form by engaging with it through performance, creation, and education sit more strongly than in the field of music. But, as some recent events have shown, this ideal can sometimes fail to cross the boundaries created by commercialism and creative control. The Glee vs Kings of Leon Dispute The American musical dramedy television series Glee, created by Ryan Murphy, has garnered an enormous following since its premiere in 2009. Capturing the hearts of audience members by showcasing the struggles and joys of high school life through song and dance, Glee has introduced many teenagers to the world of music in a fun, engaging, and innovative manner. But not everyone shares Glee creator Ryan Murphy's enthusiasm. One notable disenchantment stems from a recent disagreement with the rock band Kings of Leon, who refused to let their music be used on the show. Murphy shared his reaction with the Hollywood Reporter: "F*** you, Kings of Leon. They're self-centered a**holes, and they missed the big picture. They missed that a 7-year-old kid can see someone close to their age singing a Kings of Leon song, which will maybe make them want to join a glee club or pick up a musical instrument." Ryan Murphy's message is clear — by denying Glee the rights to use their music, Kings of Leon may inadvertently turn away potential future fans and hinder the importance of arts education among the younger generations. Murphy continues by saying, "It's like, OK, hate on arts education. You can make fun of Glee all you want, but at its heart, what we really do is turn kids on to music." Understanding the Band's Standpoint On the other hand, it's crucial not to overlook the band's perspective. Kings of Leon's frontman, Caleb Followill, is confused by the controversy. "It's gotten out of hand," he says. "At the time of the request, we hadn't even seen the show. ... This was never meant as a slap in the face to Glee or to music education or to fans of the show. We're not sure where the anger is coming from." While it's important to respect artists' control over their creations, Followill's response highlights the possible disconnect between two essential elements in promoting and celebrating art: creators and educators. The feud between the Glee creator and Kings of Leon inadvertently brings to light the question of responsibility: should musicians facilitate and promote arts education by willingly sharing their work to inspire future generations, or should they retain ultimate control over how their art is used and interpreted? A Missed Opportunity for Arts Education As educational budgets face systematic cuts, and arts courses are often the first on the chopping block, it's apparent that creative education needs all the allies it can muster. Ryan Murphy's Glee has stoked a passion for music in countless young people, and the show's inclination for covering popular hits has the potential to build a devoted audience for these artists. Thus, when artists like Kings of Leon deny the use of their music in this type of influential program, it would be remiss not to consider the potential detrimental impact on art education and future artists. Furthermore, a heated exchange between creators and educators may only serve to muddy the waters, instead of fostering an environment of collaboration and understanding for the betterment of creative learning. Conclusion In conclusion, the Glee vs Kings of Leon conflict shines a spotlight on the delicate balance between artistic control and fruition of arts education. While it is essential to respect and protect artists' rights over their creations, it is equally crucial to acknowledge the importance of inspiring future generations to keep the love for music alive.

answer:it increases. The justification for this answer is as follows: Step 1: Comprehension of the statement - The statement provides that the older a person is, the greater their chance of developing a cardiovascular disease. Step 2: Relating statement to the given question - The question asks what happens to John's risk of contracting a disease as he gets older. According to the provided passage, given that age increases, so does the risk of cardiovascular disease. Step 3: Applying information to specific example - We are required to apply this knowledge to John. Thus, as John gets older, his risk increases according to the information given. Hence, deriving the conclusion from the given information, it is clear that as John gets older, his risk of contracting a disease increases. This is based on the correlation drawn from the passage between increasing age and higher risk of cardiovascular diseases.

answer:The girl feels that the turns in her life began on that specific summer day. The event of being rear-ended by a 16-year-old boy in a pickup truck set off a series of decisions and occurrences that led her to where she is today. She acknowledges that her life, marriage, and experiences have been greatly impacted by that accident. The resulting changes in her life, including her father's new relationships, the business they ran together, and her own opportunities for traveling and personal growth, can all be traced back to that significant moment. It's evident that she views that summer day as a pivotal point in her life, leading her down a path she may not have otherwise taken.

answer:The writer thinks of the advertisements online as - They're sometimes false.