Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Please answer the following question: Dialogue: M: What are you doing, Mary? W: I am cooking the dinner, John. M: Oh. Look! The Capital Building caught on a big fire today. W: What? How about the people in the building? M: More than 220 people were killed and the building was destroyed. W: It must have taken the fire fighters a long time to put it out. M: Yes, they spent about five hours putting it out. Hm, what a strange smell! W: Oh, I forgot the food cooking on the fire! M: Be quick! Turn the gas off. You should be careful next rime, otherwise you'd have our house on fire! Question: How many people were killed in the fire? - More than 220 people. - About 50 people. - More than 300 people. A:
answer:In the dialogue, John mentions that more than 220 people were killed in the fire at the Capital Building. Therefore, the correct answer is that more than 220 people were killed in the fire.
question:You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much as you can. Please answer the following question: Write a multi-choice question for the following article: Article: We're so well educated - but we're useless students who have lost the ability to do anything practical. The only thing we've mastered is consumption . Large numbers of students have entered higher education in the past 10 years, but despite being the most educated generation in history, it seems that we've grown increasingly ignorant when it comes to basic life skills. Looking back on my first couple of weeks of living in student halls, I consider myself lucky to still be alive. Unfamiliar to fresher's, there are many hidden dangers in the dirty corners of students accommodation. I have survived a couple of serious boiling egg incidents and lots of cases of food - poisoning, probably from dirty kitchen counters. Although some of my clothes have fallen victim to ironing experimentation, I think I have now finally acquired all the domestic skills I missed out in my modem education. In 2006 and 2010, the charming educationist Sir Ken Robinson gave two very amusing talks in which he discussed the importance of creativity in education. Robinson's main viewpoint is that our current education system dislocates people from their natural talents. I would like to go a step further and propose that besides our talents, the system takes away what used to be passed from generation to generation - a working knowledge of basic life skills. Today's graduates may have earned themselves honor in history, law or economies, but when it comes to simple things like putting up a shelf to hold all their academic books, or fixing a hole in their on - trend clothes, they have to call for help from a professional handyman or tailor. Since the invention of the internet, it has never been easier for people to access information, but our highly specialized education has made us more one - sided than ever. I suggest that we start with the immediate reintroduction of some of the most vital aspects of "domestic science" education, before the current lack leads to serious accidents in student halls. Answer:
answer:Question: What is an issue facing the current generation of students according to the article? A. They are less educated than previous generations B. They have a lack of creativity in their education C. They have lost basic life skills due to their highly specialized education D. They are not interested in higher education
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Determine the sentiment: I sat glued to the screen, riveted, yawning, yet keeping an attentive eye. I waited for the next awful special effect, or the next ridiculously clichéd plot item to show up full force, so I could learn how not to make a movie. It seems when they set out to make this movie, the crew watched every single other action/science-fiction/shoot-em-up/good vs. evil movie ever made, and saw cool things and said: "Hey, we can do that." For example, the only car parked within a mile on what seems like a one way road with a shoulder not meant for parking, is the one car the protagonist, an attractive brunette born of bile, is thrown on to. The car blows to pieces before she even lands on it. The special effects were quite obviously my biggest beef with this movie. But what really put it in my bad books was the implausibility, and lack of reason for so many elements! For example, the antagonist, a flying demon with the ability to inflict harm in bizarre ways, happens upon a lone army truck transporting an important VIP. Nameless security guys with guns get out of the truck, you know they are already dead. Then the guy protecting the VIP says "Under no circumstances do you leave this truck, do you understand me?" He gets out to find the beast that killed his 3 buddies, he gets whacked in an almost comically cliché fashion. Then for no apparent reason, defying logic, convention, and common sense, the dumb ass VIP GETS OUT OF THE TRUCK!!! A lot of what happened along the course of the movie didn't make sense. Transparent acting distanced me from the movie, as well as bad camera-work, and things that just make you go: "Wow, that's incredibly cheesy." Shiri Appleby saved the movie from a 1, because she gave the movie the one element that always makes viewers enjoy the experience, sex appeal.
answer:Step 1: Read the text carefully and understand the context. I read the given text and understood that it is a review of a movie that the writer seems to have not enjoyed. Step 2: Identify key points in the text that indicate sentiment. - "riveted, yawning, yet keeping an attentive eye" - "awful special effect" - "ridiculously clichéd plot item" - "implausibility, and lack of reason for so many elements" - "transparent acting distanced me from the movie" - "bad camera-work" - "incredibly cheesy" - "Shiri Appleby saved the movie from a 1" Step 3: Analyze the sentiment based on key points. Most of the key points indicate negative sentiment towards the movie, with phrases like "awful special effect" and "implausibility". There is only one slightly positive point mentioned ("Shiri Appleby saved the movie from a 1"). Step 4: Determine the overall sentiment. After analyzing the key points in the text, I can conclude that the overall sentiment of the text is negative. The reviewer is criticizing the movie for various reasons, such as poor special effects, clichéd plot, implausibility, weak acting, and bad camera work. The only positive aspect mentioned, sex appeal, is not enough to change the overall negative sentiment.
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Read the text and determine if the sentence is true: Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak (born 19 October 1972 in Rajkot) was an Indian first-class cricketer. A left-handed batsman, he has been a prolific run scorer for Saurashtra. Now he is the coach of Saurastra Cricket Team & soon will join Gujarat Lions IPL team as Assistant Coach. Sentence: Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak is a silly man
answer:In order to determine if the sentence "Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak is a silly man" is true, I will examine the information provided in the text. Step 1: Read and analyze the given text. - Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak was born on 19 October 1972 in Rajkot. - He was an Indian first-class cricketer. - He is a left-handed batsman and has been a prolific run scorer for Saurashtra. - He is currently the coach of Saurastra Cricket Team. - He will soon join Gujarat Lions IPL team as Assistant Coach. Step 2: Evaluate the sentence for truth. The sentence in question states that Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak is a "silly man." However, the information provided in the text focuses on his cricket career and coaching positions. It does not provide any insight into his personal traits or behavior, particularly in regards to being silly. Conclusion: As there is no information provided in the text to support the statement "Shitanshu Hargovindbhai Kotak is a silly man," I cannot determine whether the sentence is true or false.