Appearance
question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Translate to Finnish: For, in fact, while we may share the idea that aid and incentives for employment cannot be totally subjected to conditions of rigid technocratic controls which are in danger of excluding one disadvantaged section of job seekers from this aid, our vision encourages us to propose positive and constructive support, rather than supervision, in the procedures which must be implemented, which are still, as we know, difficult ones.
answer:Niinpä, itse asiassa, vaikka saattaisimme olla samaa mieltä siitä, että avun ja työllistymistä koskevien kannustimien ei pitäisi kokonaan perustua tiukkoihin teknokraattisiin valvontoihin, jotka saattavat jättää yhden huonossa asemassa olevan työnhakijaryhmän avun ulkopuolelle, näkemyksemme kannustaa meitä ehdottamaan positiivista ja rakentavaa tukea, pikemminkin kuin valvontaa, niissä menettelyissä, joita on toteutettava ja jotka ovat, kuten tiedämme, edelleen vaikeita. Selitämme tämän kuin viisivuotiaalle: Joskus autetaan ihmisiä löytämään töitä ja annetaan heille apua. Mutta tämä apu ei voi olla liian ankaraa, koska silloin osa ihmisistä jää ulkopuolelle. Sen sijaan meidän pitäisi tarjota rohkaisevaa ja ystävällistä apua, jotta kaikki voivat saada töitä, vaikka se onkin vaikeaa tehtävää.
question:You are an AI assistant. You should describe the task and explain your answer. While answering a multiple choice question, first output the correct answer(s). Then explain why other answers are wrong. You might need to use additional knowledge to answer the question. Have you ever looked closely at a globe? That continents look like a giant jig-saw puzzle. North America looks like it could fit next to Europe. The edge of South America matches Africa. Scientists noticed these same features. It caused them to start asking questions. They wanted to know if these continents were was connected? If so, how can something so large move so far? What could possibly have enough force to move such a giant slab of rock? Is there other evidence that can provide clues to the past positions of continents? How can answering these questions help us? A scientist named Alfred Wegener had these same questions. Wegener look at rocks on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. He noticed they were the same type and age. He thought that the rocks must have formed side by side. He proposed that the rocks then drifted apart. One part went with North America. The other part stayed with Europe. Question: "What parts did Wegener say the layers of rock of the same size and age formed when drifting apart?" Answer: "One part went with North America. The other part stayed with Europe" Is this answer to the question correct? Pick from: *no. *yes.
answer:*yes. This answer is correct because it directly quotes the text, stating that Wegener proposed that the rocks with the same type and age drifted apart, with one part going with North America and the other part staying with Europe. This conclusion was drawn from the observation of rocks on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, which served as evidence for Wegener's hypothesis.
question:April 1, 2006 Walter died today. Found out this morning over breakfast. Suicide. Walter. I'm still trying to wrap my mind around it. Suicide. Walter wasn't suicidal. I know that, know it for a fact. But he is dead. Why? I am not foolish enough to suspect "foul play" as they say in the mystery stories. No one cares enough about a community college art teacher to murder him. But suicide? Something is wrong here. Very wrong. April 2, 2006 I didn't realize until this morning that yesterday was April Fools day. Some kind of sick joke? But that's not like Walter either. He was a little crazy, but not that kind of crazy. Still I keep half expecting to pick up my voice and hear his voice yell, "Gotcha!" But it is no joke. I know he is dead. (Later) Got a package today. From Walter. Scary considering what I wrote about expecting him to call. I can't express the chill I got when I saw his name on the label. A message from the dead. Surely it's not a good Omen. It's a painting. Or at least I think it is. The package is the right shape, and knowing Walter it seems likely, but...I haven't yet worked up the courage to open it yet. I'm afraid of what I might find. April 3, 2006 Went to the funeral today. Walter's wife, Martha, was in hysterics. Can't say I blame her. It was awkward being there seeing someone in the most vulnerable possible condition. I didn't know her that well. Walter and I rarely interacted outside of work, so I have very little knowledge of his personal life. Sylvia went up to her and hugged her even though she'd never met her before in her life. It must be something with women to be able to make that kind of spontaneous connection. I just shook her hand, and told her I was sorry. I don't make a habit of crying in public, but seeing her so shaken up brought tears to the edges of my eyes, and I did nothing to wipe them away. After five years of friendship it's the least Walter deserves of me. One other thing. The package. It's still sitting there in my study. Mocking me. That's how it feels anyway. Should... According to the above context, choose the correct option to answer the following question. Question: At the funeral, the author thinks that: Options: A. it's awkward to see someone in their most vulnerable condition B. the package is evil C. not enough information D. it's funny to see someone dead Answer:
answer:A. it's awkward to see someone in their most vulnerable condition
question:You are an AI assistant. Provide a detailed answer so user don’t need to search outside to understand the answer. On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Good app. Only issue i have is having to open adocument twice to read it. Otherwise it is a great app." Answer:
answer:I would rate this review a 4 out of 5. The reviewer shares a positive experience with the app and mentions it as being great, which indicates a favorable view of it. However, the deduction of one point comes from the identified issue of having to open a document twice to read it, suggesting there's room for improvement. Overall, the review is mostly positive but acknowledges a specific problem that could be addressed to enhance user experience.