question:Given the text: If you are purchasing a new smartphone today, chances are very high that it will run either Google’s Android or Apple’s iOS mobile operating systems. These new terrace estimated for more than 99 percent of all new smartphones shipped over the last year, and that rose to 99.7 percent in 2017. The exceptional news is that both smartphone operating systems are excellent and superb. They have far more in similarities than contrasr, but there are some crucial differences that you will like to take note of. We are going to look at Android vs. IOS in different categories here and select a winner for each one. Ultimately, the best platform for you depends on you. Pick the things that matter most to you when it comes to making your selection. Apple has always been at the high end of the market when it comes to pricing. The iPhone X decides to take things to a whole new level with a primary price of 1,000. The iPhone 8 Plus begins from 800 and the iPhone 8 from 700. If you feel that it is too expensive and you do not want to pay much, then you can go for the two-year-old iPhone 6S at 450 or the diminutive iPhone SE at 350. That’s as cheap as it gets unless you purchase from the second-hand market. In terms of variety, nothing competes with Android. You can spend a lot if you want to, for example, Google’s new Pixel 2 phones and Samsung’s Galaxy Note line match Apple’s iPhone pricing, but there is also a large choice of low-cost handsets from a collection of several manufacturers and the platform has been optimized deliberately to run on low-end hardware. The fact that Android also leads the field in free apps makes it the natural choice for the budget-conscious. In terms of affordability, Andriod takes the win. Though, numbers are not the best decider due to the fact that most of us only use a handful of apps and mostly the popular ones which tend to be available on both platforms. Traditionally, iOS has been a more advantageous platform for developers, so there has been a penchant for new apps to emerge there first, but that is dynamic as Android’s market share continues to increase. In the United states of america., iOS is still at the top, but developers elsewhere are increasingly targeting Android first. The Play Store still has a larger percentage of free apps than the App Store. Ultimately, quality beats quantity and so this is a narrow win for iOS. As one of the largest bugbears for smartphone owners, battery life is needed to put into consideration. It is arduous to compare the two terrace because there is no particular hardware. IOS is optimized to drain the most out of the battery per mAh rating, but you can buy an Android device with a much larger battery that will easily outlive the iPhone. Both platform gives you the opportunity to see your battery usage at a glance, broken down by app, but only Android shows the conjecture of how much battery life you have left. They both pitch power saving form which can improve your battery life by limiting performance, connectivity, and other power-sapping features, but precisely how it works is generally more customizable on Android. This category is far from clear cut, but comparing similarly priced Android phones with iPhones, they tend to have longer battery life, so Android gets the win. This has always been one of the fundamental strengths of Android as it is very easy to theme your phone, you can set up the outline and formation you want on your home screen, add gizmo and shortcuts, and even change your entire user interface with launchers. You can also set backgrounds in iOS and there is a constrain support for widgets, Android also allows for setting up third-party apps as your default options for many things that are still locked down in iOS. If you truly want a personalized look for your home screen, then Android is the platform for you. Rooting gives you addmittance to more apps, the current OS updates , new software skins to get the invention you want, it also gives you the opportunity of getting rid of bloatware from carriers and manufacturers, and also tweaks to boost your device’s speed and battery life, and lots more Many Android original equipment manufacturers also offer a way to crack the bootloader, which actuates how the operating system loads up on your device. Apple is totally against this kind of thing. Jailbreaking is a choice for iOS, which allows you download and install apps from outside the App Store and burke some other restriction.Therefore android have the win here. In conclusion, different division will be important to different people, so you should pay attention to the ones that count for you and make your decision based on that. If battery life and charging are a crucial factor, then, android is definitely the choice.. Both Android and iOS are developed, feature-packed platforms with far more similarities than differences, any of the platform is recommended. "How to Choose a New Smartphone Today." GradesFixer, 27 Feb. 2019, https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-to-choose-a-new-smartphone-today/. Accessed 23 April 2019. Can you summarize the main differences between Android and iOS in terms of pricing, variety, and app quality?

question:Can you give me a summary of the battery life comparison between Android and iOS? I want to know which one lasts longer.

question:Can you tell me more about the differences between Android and iOS in terms of customization and themes?

question:Walt Disney ’s stock is up about 19% since late October, largely on the strength of the latest Star Wars movies, but Goldman Sachs is telling clients the stock’s ability to secure those gains is not clear as earnings approach. To position for what is likely to be a volatile earnings report, the bank is telling clients to “straddle” the stock in anticipation the stock surges sharply lower – or higher. According to Goldman’s volatility database, Disney’s (ticker: DIS) options are potentially underpricing the Feb. 7 report. In other words, Goldman thinks Disney’s report could cause the stock to move more than 3% priced by the puts and calls. With the stock at 108.16, Goldman told clients to consider buying the February 108 put and call that expire Feb. 10. The straddle – that is buying a put and call with the same strike price and expiration – cost 4.36. For the straddle to prove profitable, the stock must move more than the 4.36 cost of the trade. Investors use straddles to speculate on stocks that they think will make a sharp move in reaction to an event yet are unsure about the direction of the move. The strategy is one of the more expensive approaches investors can take in the options market. Why? It entails buying a put and a call. Most investors prefer selling options to collect premiums, or buying options to express directional views. Despite those facts, Goldman has a good track record recommending the straddle strategy to clients when implied volatility seems to be understating outcomes as is now the case with Disney. To be sure, Goldman is bullish on Disney, rating the stock Buy. But many of the reasons why the bank is bullish – including movies to be released – are six to 12 months away. Still, Drew Borst, who follows Disney for the bank, sees the stock rising 24% over the next year. Borst expects Disney will report earnings per share of 1.50 for the first quarter, in-line with consensus estimates. To him, the risk is that Disney’s next quarter’s earnings, expected by analysts to be 1.31 a share, will be 12 cents below the consensus as key earnings drivers are some months away. Investors who agree with Goldman’s description of Disney’s potential trajectory – that is possible short-term volatility followed by a rally fueled by good news six months out – can consider another trade. To monetize Borst’s longer-term view, consider selling Disney’s April 105 puts to buy the stock on a pullback. With the stock at 107.60, the put was bid at 2.48. If the stock advances, you can keep the put premium. If it declines below the strike price at expiration, you buy the stock. The effective purchase price is 102.52 (strike price less premium received). The key risk – as is always the case with put sales – is that the stock falls far below the put strike price. But that risk seems less likely given that concerns about ESPN’s subscription rates amid a fast-changing media environment are receding. Walt Disney’s stock is up about 19% since late October, largely on the strength of the latest Star Wars movies, but Goldman Sachs is telling clients the stock’s ability to secure those gains is not clear as earnings approach. Why does Goldman Sachs believe that Disney's options may be underpricing the upcoming earnings report, and what options strategy are they recommending as a result?