Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You should describe the task and explain your answer. While answering a multiple choice question, first output the correct answer(s). Then explain why other answers are wrong. Think like you are answering to a five year old. What is the sentiment of the following review? This is a great local grill/bar for good grub, drinks and gaming. They have a separate bar area from the restaurant so we ate first in the dining room and then headed to the bar for drinks and video poker. The decor isn't consistent or memorable but it's a quirky and comfortable place. The menu was large and there are great breakfast/lunch/dinner options. Oddly, breakfast is not offered 24/7 here unlike other similar places in the area. The service was good and food was out quickly. It is your basic diner/grill food but cooked to perfection and very delicious! We received excellent service at the bar and drinks were free while we gambled. I will definitely switch off between Timbers and Henry's when I'm in the mood for an evening close to home. Select from: (i). negative. (ii). positive.

answer:(ii). positive. This review is positive because the person describes the place as great, good, quirky, comfortable, and delicious. They also mention they will come back again. The other option, negative, is incorrect because the review is not saying bad things about the grill/bar. Instead, it praises the food, service, and atmosphere. So, it is a happy review!

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Review: bolstered by an astonishing voice cast ( excepting love hewitt ) , an interesting racial tension , and a storyline Is this movie review sentence negative or positive?

answer:Step 1: Examine the adjective and phrases used in the sentence. In this sentence, there are several adjectives and phrases that indicate the reviewer's opinion about the movie: 1. "astonishing voice cast" 2. "interesting racial tension" 3. "excepting love hewitt" Step 2: Determine the positive or negative connotation of each adjective or phrase. Looking at the adjectives and phrases, it can be observed that: 1. "astonishing voice cast" carries a positive connotation, as the reviewer praises the voice actors in the movie. 2. "interesting racial tension" also conveys a positive impression, as it means that the movie has a noteworthy element regarding the depiction of racial issues. 3. "excepting love hewitt" has a slightly negative connotation, as it implies that the reviewer didn't think Love Hewitt's performance was on par with the rest of the voice cast. Step 3: Analyze the overall sentiment. Taking all the adjectives and phrases into account, the overall sentiment of this movie review sentence seems to be mostly positive. The positive aspects of the movie - the astonishing voice cast and interesting racial tension - outweigh the single negative point about Love Hewitt's performance. Although there is a negative component, the majority of the review's focus is on the positive features of the film. Conclusion: The movie review sentence has a predominantly positive sentiment.

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Write an article with the title: "The doc ‘The Act of Killing’ has to be seen to be believed" Article:

answer:Title: The doc ‘The Act of Killing’ has to be seen to be believed Introduction Imagine a documentary that not only depicts the darkest aspects of humanity, but also delves into the psyche of the perpetrators of unthinkable atrocities. This is precisely what 'The Act of Killing' aims to achieve. Directed by Joshua Oppenheimer, the film is a surreal and chilling exploration of the minds of mass murderers who participated in the 1965-1966 Indonesian genocide. In this article, we explore the reasons why this documentary is a must-see experience beyond simple comprehension. Unmasking the Perpetrators Step 1: Selecting the subjects Oppenheimer's unique approach to storytelling begins with selecting subjects who are not just accountable for their heinous crimes but are willing to reenact their actions on-camera. The film primarily focuses on Anwar Congo, a former gangster turned death squad leader, who claims to have killed over 1,000 people during a political purge. The inclusion of such a chilling character encourages an open dialogue that showcases the intricacies of his twisted thought processes. Step 2: Utilizing reenactments The use of reenactments further intensifies the viewer's experience by graphically illustrating the cruelty of these acts. This powerful visual element reinforces the stark reality of the horrors that took place, with each reenactment exposing the barbaric nature of the killers. Through this unique storytelling method, Oppenheimer offers a look into the darkest recesses of humanity and the twisted ways in which individuals can embrace violence. Understanding the Human Psyche Step 3: Scrutinizing motivation and justification One of the documentary's most compelling aspects is its focus on the motivations and justifications that the mass murderers use to rationalize their actions. The film showcases how individuals can become willing actors in such events and further highlights the dangers of conformity and obedience to authority. By examining the perpetrators' reasoning, the documentary becomes a thought-provoking exploration of human morality and ethics. Step 4: Analyzing the impact on the killers 'The Act of Killing' examines the emotional and psychological impact that participating in mass murder has on the individuals involved. Throughout the film, it is evident that some of the killers struggle with guilt and haunted memories, while others appear to have escaped any semblance of conscience. This dichotomy raises important questions about the capacity for remorse within the human heart and the potential for redemption. A Challenging Viewing Experience Step 5: Confronting viewers with reality The documentary's raw and visceral nature forces viewers to confront the reality of genocide and the depths of human depravity. This challenging experience reveals the importance of grappling with the darkest chapters of history and the responsibility society bears in acknowledging and learning from these atrocities. Step 6: Highlighting the need for empathy and understanding Ultimately, 'The Act of Killing' is a powerful reminder of the importance of empathy and understanding in a world that is fraught with division and conflict. By exposing the complexities of these events and examining the motivations and justifications of the individuals involved, the documentary encourages viewers to seek a deeper understanding of humanity and the potential for both profound evil and redemption. Conclusion ‘The Act of Killing’ is a documentary that defies expectation and transcends the typical viewing experience. It is a stark and unsettling exploration of the human psyche that demands reflection and self-examination. As a film that must be seen to be believed, it serves as a powerful reminder of the actions and consequences that define the darkest chapters in human history.

question:You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much as you can. Please answer the following question: What were the last names of the three people who played little part in the general life of the camp? Answer the above question based on the context below: Bartlett's decision to deposit stores on the ice ensured that an ice camp, known as "Shipwreck Camp", was more or less established by the time Karluk sank. Two shelters had been built, one a snow igloo with a canvas roof, the other constructed from packing cases. To the latter was added a kitchen with a large stove rescued from Karluk's engine room. A small, separate shelter was built for the five Inuit, and a rough perimeter created from coal bags and assorted containers. In McKinlay's words, the camp provided "substantial and comfortable houses on which we could rely for shelter for a long time." Stores were plentiful, and the party was able to eat well. Much of the time in the first days of the camp was spent preparing and adjusting clothing and sleeping gear, in readiness for the forthcoming march to Wrangel Island. The ice drift was slowly moving the camp in the direction of the island, but as yet there was insufficient daylight to attempt the march.Amid this activity Mackay and Murray, now joined by the anthropologist Henri Beuchat, played little part in the general life of the camp and expressed their determination to leave it, independently, as soon as possible. Bartlett wanted to wait for the longer daylight hours of February before attempting the march, but was persuaded by McKinlay and Mamen to send a trailbreaking group to set up an advance camp on Wrangel Island. A party of four, led by Karluk's first officer Alexander Anderson and including crew members Charles Barker, John Brady and Edmund Golightly, left Shipwreck Camp on 21 January with instructions from Bartlett to establish their camp at or near Berry Point on the north shore of Wrangel Island. On 4 February Bjarne Mamen, who accompanied the party as a scout, returned to Shipwreck Camp and reported that he had left the group a few miles short of land that was evidently not Wrangel Island, and was probably Herald Island, 38 miles (61 km) from their intended destination. This was the last sighting of Anderson's party; their ultimate fate was... Answer:

answer:Mackay, Murray, and Beuchat

Released under the Neuralink License.

has loaded